During 2022 there were many relevant advances in science, including artificial intelligence, biotechnology, personalized medicine and climate science. Of course, 2023 is expected to bring different innovations in these and other areas.

Among the most significant scientific advances of the past year, the journal Nature points out that Artificial Intelligence is one of those that has had the greatest impact on society since it has made its way in different sectors, from the automation of industrial processes to the improvement in health and welfare.

All of these advances are the result of increased investment in research, as well as increased access to more data and analytical tools, enabling them to conduct more precise and complex investigations.




The first spent nuclear fuel storage facility will start operating in Olkiluoto, Finland, in the coming year. The Finnish government approved the construction of the underground repository in 2015 xnxx. The fuel will be packed in copper canisters, covered with clay, and buried in bedrock tunnels 400 meters underground, where it will remain sealed for several hundred thousand years until the radiation levels are harmless.



The US regulators approved the commercialization of Lecanemab, developed by Eisai and Biogen, it will be available for people who are in the initial stage of Alzheimer’s. The drug is a monoclonal antibody that reduces the buildup of the protein beta-amyloid in the brain, which accumulates in plaques that clog the brain, a key feature of the disease.


The Muon g-2 experiment studies how muons, which are short-lived particles, behave in magnetic fields. The results, which are expected to come to light in 2023, could offer proof of the standard model of physics, as well as shed light on forces in nature that we don’t know about.


The first approval of a CRISPR gene-editing therapy to treat genetic blood diseases such as β-thalassemia and sickle cell disease could be announced within the next year, due to promising clinical trial results.

The treatment is developed by the companies Vertex Pharmaceuticals and CRISPR Therapeutics. It uses CRISPR-Cas9 technology to edit the defective gene in the patient’s stem cells before they are re-infused. Vertex is expected to submit an application to the FDA in March for approval to make exa-cel available to people with β-thalassemia or sickle cell disease.


By 2023, there are several space expeditions planned. For example, NASA plans to launch Artemis III, which will carry the first female astronaut to the surface of space. Likewise, the European Space Agency (ESA) will launch its JUICE mission, to explore Jupiter. The ship will arrive in 2029.

Other missions include the collaboration between NASA and SpaceX for the International Space Station (ISS). Finally, there is the Japanese Space Agency (JAXA) MMX (Martian Moons Exploration) mission that plans to explore the satellites of Mars, Phobos and Deimos in 2026, anticipating a launch in 2023.


Following the successful development of mRNA vaccines for COVID-19, several companies are investigating the possibility of applying this technology to develop vaccines against other diseases. For example, BioNTech in Germany is planning to begin the first human trials of mRNA vaccines against malaria, tuberculosis, and genital herpes.

In addition, BioNTech is collaborating with Pfizer to develop an mRNA-based vaccine candidate to reduce shingles disease. Moderna in Massachusetts also has mRNA vaccines in development for the viruses that cause genital herpes and shingles. In addition, BioNTech and Pfizer have begun trials of an mRNA vaccine designed to protect against both COVID-19 and influenza.



Related Posts



This is not a tongue twister or a joke, although it seems like it. Far from humorous expressions or puns, the strong force is real and, according to recent news from the scientific world, it has been possible for the first time to extract the force from the strong force.

The brains behind the operation were a group of physicists from the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, thus achieving incredible advances in the study of particle physics. That is to say, the force that keeps the entire fabric of our curious and unknown Universe well united and cohesive.



Before advancing on the subject, it is necessary to clarify for some what the strong force or strong nuclear force is. To do so, let’s start by understanding a bit of particle physics.

In this field of study, there is something called the “standard model”, which is made up of four fundamental interactions: the weak nuclear force, the electromagnetic force, the gravitational interaction and, finally, the strong nuclear force. Each of them has a function within the behavior of the particles porno français.

In the case of the strong force, it is the one that keeps the atoms well united and cohesive. It is also responsible for the quarks united forming protons to remain in that state.

Until recently, calculating the strong force of short distances was, although complicated, possible. However, things got complicated when talking about much longer distances.

Although there were many models to try to explain it, each one gave its own answer. Some predict that the force always gets stronger with distance, while others estimate that at a certain point it begins to decrease. A third, intermediate group theorized that, at a certain point, the force stabilizes, neither increases nor decreases.




Faced with the variety of answers obtained through the models presented above, the Jefferson Lab scientists found a halfway answer: the force tends to stabilize after crossing a certain limit.

However, this remains nothing more than an empirical approximation that lacks all the necessary elements for the establishment of a theory that explains the behavior of the strong force. Let us remember, after all, that the strong force is responsible for 99% of interactions in ordinary mass. There are many variables to consider.

From this first approach, it will be possible to rule out some of the failed models. In this way, step by step, science can move towards an answer closer to reality.

To close, and above all, to help you as a final exercise to understand the importance of this discovery, we invite you to consider this. Think about nuclear energy, from the one that is present in power plants to the one that has a leading role in atomic bombs.

That force, so immense, so colossal… is but a residue of the true strong force. Surprising, isn’t it?


Related Posts






Physics is, without a doubt, one of the most complex and interesting sciences. Being his field of study so vast, it seems difficult to approach it without dying in the attempt.

Curious about this mysterious and seemingly complex world? Today we present a few ideas and concepts that can help you approach physics in a more friendly way.




We start this list with the beginning of the universe itself: the Big Bang. This theory belongs to the renowned Catholic priest and astrophysicist Georges Lemaître, who explained the origin of the universe from a big explosion and put an end to the eternal discussion of whether our universe really has a beginning or not.
According to Lemaître, this happened 13.8 billion years ago, and it continues to have repercussions today porno.



When we talked about repercussions in the previous point, we were referring to this. This theory follows from the other to affirm that our universe was not only created from an explosion that generated the expansion of the universe as we know it.

But, in addition, this universe currently continues to expand constantly, and it does so at a very accelerated rate.



We move away a little from the universe and its creation to talk about one of the fundamental pieces of the scientific revolution of the 20th century. This branch of physics studies nature at very, very small scales. Thanks to this, we can understand today how atoms behave and the forces that are exerted on them.



Quantum mechanics and its studies in the smallest dimension of physics allowed us to understand and develop the standard model of physics. That is, a series of rules that allow us to understand how particles act and interact.
According to the standard model of physics, there are two types of particles.
• Bosons: particles responsible for the interaction between particles.
• Fermions: particles responsible for the formation of matter.



Speaking of matter, let’s take the opportunity to debunk some myths. Basic education teaches us from an early age that there are only three states of matter: solid, liquid and gas.
Mistake! Yes, certainly matter is commonly found in the above states. However, there are others such as plasma, degenerate matter, Bose-Einstein condensate, etc.



Thanks to the studies of matter, thermodynamics has allowed us to approach a concept as complex as it is depressing: entropy.
Entropy is known roughly as the degree of disorder of energy. An energy that, since it cannot be used, is lost. According to modern thermodynamics, entropy is responsible for aging, the degradation of ecosystems and the universe itself.



“Everything is relative”. How many times have you heard that? Well, this phrase apparently taken lightly has a lot of truth.

Einstein’s Theory of Relativity arrived in 1905 to change everything we thought we knew about the universe and make sense of the inconsistencies hitherto found in physics.
This theory defends, broadly speaking, that the speed of movement as such of an object cannot be measured. What we really measure is the speed with respect to other objects.



In nature, there are four forces that respond to all the phenomena that physics can study in our universe.
• Gravity: the force that attracts us to the Earth, and that attracts the Earth to the Sun.
• Electromagnetic force: the force that arises from the union of electricity, lightning and magnets.
• Strong nuclear force: that force that holds the nuclei of atoms together.
• Weak nuclear force: responsible for the radioactive decay of subatomic particles.


Although it seems obvious today, this statement took 2000 years of research and scientific advances to discover. Thanks to her, we were able to start studying fields of physics such as Atomic Physics, Particle Physics and even part of Chemistry.



After everything seen so far, what do you imagine could be the fundamental concept or idea with which we close this list? Well, something shocking: that which explains why we can know so much about the universe.

And the reason seems simple, but it has many implications: our universe follows mathematical laws. That means that through numbers we can come to understand how the world in which we live operates. We can create hypotheses, theories and later laws that explain how the universe works and, furthermore, that allow us to predict behaviors and events.

Physics is, without a doubt, very interesting







Do Forces Holding Matter Together?

All the known matter from proton to atoms of liquids, solids and huge conglomerations of matter (in the stars and galaxies) is simply made of three quarks u, d and s. To form all these structures, the underlying particles must work together and interact in some way. They do this through only a few basic interactions, which we can think of as forces. The action of the forces often holds matter together and gives it shape, but sometimes the forces can blow matter apart.

Familiar Forces

The most familiar basic force is gravity. It keeps our feet on the ground and the planets in motion around the Sun. All particles of matter feel the influence of gravity, but on the scale of individual particles, the effects are extremely small. Only when we have matter in bulk as in ourselves, or on larger scales in planets, stars and galaxies then gravity dominate. A much stronger fundamental force manifests itself in the effects of electricity and magnetism. Comb your hair and electric charge builds up on the comb, especially in dry weather. The comb can then attract small pieces of paper, so that you can pick them up, against the force of gravity. On a larger scale, a magnet will lift up pins and nails, while a large industrial magnet can lift scrap metal even cars. These effects are all due to the same underlying electromagnetic force. Unlike gravity this can give rise to both attractive and repulsive effects. Opposite electric charges (positive and negative) and opposite magnetic poles (north and south) attract, but charges or poles of the same type repel each other. The electromagnetic force binds negative electrons to the positive nuclei in atoms, and underlies the interactions between atoms that give rise to molecules and to solids and liquids. It is also ultimately responsible for larger-scale effects, such as surface tensions and friction, which depend on the forces acting on the atoms near the surface of materials.

Unfamiliar Forces

At scales of the size of atomic nuclei and smaller, two unfamiliar forces come into play in the interactions between the basic particles of matter. These are called the weak force and the strong force. The weak force leads to the decay of neutrons, and many other particles, including the pions and muons common in cosmic rays. In ordinary matter in the world about us, the decay of the neutron underlies many natural occurrences of radioactivity. The weak force is also responsible for hydrogen burning in the centre of stars, where hydrogen the lightest element is converted into the second lightest element, helium. In the very hot dense centre of a star, ordinary hydrogen nuclei (protons) can come close enough to form a heavier nucleus of hydrogen, “heavy hydrogen” or deuterium, which consists of a proton and a neutron. This first step in the conversion of hydrogen to helium involves the weak force, as a proton changes into a neutron.

The strong force is responsible for holding quarks together within protons, neutrons and other particles, including pions. It also prevents the protons in the nucleus from flying apart under the influence of the repulsive electrical force between them. (Protons should repel each other as they all have the same positive charge.) This is because within the proton the strong force is about 100 times stronger than the electromagnetic force. The strong force keeps quarks bound within larger particles, so that quarks never appear alone. This is because as you try to pull two quarks apart, the force becomes stronger. This is unlike the more familiar effects of gravity and electromagnetism, where the forces become weaker with distance.

How forces work?

The basic forces, or interactions, between the particles of matter all act through a “force carrier”, which is exchanged between the interacting particles. In this way, interactions between particles are like a game of “catch”, which can either bring the particles together (an attractive force) or push them apart (a repulsive force). There is a different type of carrier for each of the basic forces Photons, the “particles” of light, carry the electromagnetic force. The photons have no mass and no electric charge, and can be exchanged over large distances so that the electromagnetic force is infinite in range. The carriers of the weak force are called W+, W- and Z. The W is electrically charged (W+ and W-), while the Z is neutral (Z0). These carriers are massive, each weighing about 100 times as much as a proton. This makes them difficult to exchange at low energies, so the weak force appears weak. The carriers of the strong force are called gluons. They have no electric charge and no mass, but they carry a special charge called colour that gives them their power to hold quarks together so strongly that the quarks are never seen as individual particles. The force carrier of gravitation called graviton yet not discovered.

How the invisible are studied?

The basic building blocks of which we and everything in the world about us are made are extremely tiny. Even if you enlarged one of these tiny particles a million million (1012) times, it would still be smaller than a full stop. Like high-flying aeroplanes they are invisible, but just like aeroplanes, in the right conditions we can see the trails they make.

First we need to knock the particles out of the atoms where they normally hide. For this we use machines, called accelerators. Once we have done this we can follow their trails in special detectors, and then the excitement begins!

The mass mystery

The various matter and force-carrying particles weigh in with a wide range of masses. The photon, carrier of the electromagnetic force, and the gluons that carry the strong force, are completely massless, while the conveyors of the weak force, the W and Z particles, each weigh as much as 80 to 90 protons or as much as a reasonably sized nucleus. The most massive fundamental particle found so far, the super heavyweight, is the top quark. It is twice as heavy as the W and Z particles, and weighs about the same as a nucleus of gold. The electron, on the other hand, is approximately 350,000 times lighter than the top quark, and the neutrinos may even have no mass at all.

Why there is such a range of masses is one of the remaining puzzles of particle physics. Indeed, how particles get masses at all is not yet properly understood. In the simplest theories, all particles are massless, which is clearly wrong, so something has to be introduced to give them their various weights. In the Standard Model, the particles acquire their masses through a mechanism named after theorist Peter Higgs. According to the theory, all the matter particles and force carriers interact with another particle, known as the Higgs boson. It is the strength of this interaction that gives rise to what we call mass: the stronger the interaction, the greater the mass.

Experiments have yet to show whether this theory is correct. The search for the Higgs porno boson (or bosons) has already begun at the colliders and will continue into this century with new machines like the Large Hadron Collider.

Particles and the Universe

Looking into outer space means looking back in time. When you look at a galaxy a million light years away, you are looking at it as it was a million years ago. Looking at the sky at night is like reading the history of the Universe. Looking into inner space – into the structure of matter – also provides a view back in time. Experiments today collide together particles at the highest possible energies in order to penetrate into the deepest layers of matter. The enormous concentration of energy leads to the creation of new matter just as when matter was first created in the initial instants after the Big Bang with which the Universe began. Studies of the smallest structures in the Universe, in high-energy particle physics are therefore intimately linked with observations in astronomy of the largest structures. This meeting point between particle physics and cosmology is one of the most fascinating aspects of modern physics. Indeed, through the scenario of the Big Bang, observations in astronomy have testable consequences in particle physics and vice versa.

Into Outer Space

Astronomical evidence shows that the Universe is expanding, as if from a great explosion, the Big Bang, nearly 15 thousand million years ago. In the beginning, the Universe was unimaginably hot and dense, its whole size smaller than a single atom! Since then it has expanded, and cooled to only 3 degrees above the absolute zero of temperature. When we look at distant stars and galaxies we are also looking back in time. Some of the mysterious objects called quasars are so far away that when we look at them we are seeing light that was emitted more than 10 thousand million years ago. (The quasars are more than 10 thousand million light years distant.) It might seem that by looking at objects even further away we could come close to observing the origin of the Universe in the Big Bang. However, the conditions in the early Universe prevent us from doing this.

Before the Universe was about 300,000 years old it was too hot for neutral atoms to exist. Instead the Universe would have been hot plasma of freely moving charged particles – electrons and nuclei in the later stages, or more exotic mixes at earlier times. Light would then have been absorbed and re-emitted by the charged particles – in other words, the Universe would have been opaque. Only at an age of 300,000 years would the Universe have cooled sufficiently for electrons to bind to nuclei to form atoms. Only then would light begin to travel freely and the Universe become transparent. The early opaqueness prevents astronomers from seeing directly back to the Big Bang, before the formation of atoms. To study the creation of matter itself requires high-energy particle physics and experiments.

Into Inner Space

Particle physicists study the basic blocks of matter and the forces between them by colliding particles of matter together at very high energies. The collisions create the fundamental constituents that no longer exist in ordinary matter, but which were common in the energetic early Universe.

By concentrating a large amount of energy into the smallest possible volume, equal numbers of particles of matter and antimatter are created from pure energy according to the equation E = mc2. The energy concentrations created correspond to the conditions prevailing in the early Universe, less than a tenth of a thousandth of a millionth of a second (10-10 s) after the Big Bang. In this way, particle physics probes the conditions of the very early Universe minute fractions of a second after it began. The highest energy concentrations achieved at different experiments so far have been with nuclei of lead atoms accelerated. In these collisions, the energy concentration may be sufficient for the nucleons (protons and neutrons) within the nuclei to “merge” for an instant, so that the quarks and gluons normally locked within the nucleons form”quark-gluon plasma”. This state of matter should have existed in the very early Universe, before it had cooled sufficiently for the quarks and gluons to condense out to form the protons and neutrons of familiar matter. In experiments like these, particle physics probes forms of matter unseen since the very early Universe.

Cosmic Messengers

Among the commonest particles in the Universe are neutrinos. Like photons, they outnumber the protons and neutrons of bulk matter by around one thousand millions to one. Each cubic centimeter of space contains a hundred or so neutrinos left over from the Big Bang at the beginning of the Universe. Every second, 60 thousand million neutrinos from the Sun pass through each square centimeter of the Earth surface and through you! When supernova 1987a blazed forth, the Earth was soaked with a tidal wave of neutrinos. Most passed through the Earth unheeded, but a few were caught in underground particle detectors. Paradoxically, neutrinos are probably the least understood of particles. They have no electric charge, and interact with other matter only through the weak force. There are three types of neutrino, which are like electrically neutral versions of the electron, and its two heavier relatives, the muon and the tau. These neutrinos are all much lighter than their charged counterparts, but we have no idea how much lighter or whether indeed they have any mass at all. Neutrinos are so common in the Universe that even if they have only a small mass their total effect could dominate the Universe! The masses of the neutrinos are certainly smaller than we can measure by standard methods, so experiments have to be more ingenious. One technique is to look for neutrinos changing or “oscillating” from one type to another. This would be possible if, but only if, one or more of the neutrino types have some mass. This exciting possibility could explain why fewer neutrinos reach Earth from the Sun than expected, as the present detectors pick up only one type of neutrino, the electron neutrino. Experiments with beams of neutrinos produced from particle collisions are also testing whether neutrinos oscillate, at higher energies than the Sun produces.

Grand Unification And Super-Symmetry

One of the major breakthroughs in particle physics in the 1970s was the successful development of “electroweak” theory. This brings together electricity and magnetism, light and radioactivity, in a unified description of the electromagnetic and weak forces that underlie these very different phenomena. Now theorists are attempting a broader “grand unification”, which will also include the strong force that holds the bulk of matter together at the nuclear level.

Experiments show that the strong force becomes weaker in its effects as energies increase. This suggests that at very high energies, the strengths of the electromagnetic, weak and strong force are the same, and the forces are basically indistinguishable. The energies involved are thousand millions of times greater than particle accelerators can reach, but they would have existed in the very early Universe, almost immediately after the Big Bang, when the Universe was a mere 10-34 seconds old.

Fortunately for present-day experiments, grand unified theories do have consequences at lower energies. In particular, for the theories to be sensible they generally require that Natures has a deep symmetry, known as “super-symmetry”, which so far has Super-symmetry links the matter particles (the quarks and leptons) with the force-carrying particles, and implies that there are additional “super particles” necessary to complete the symmetry. These super particles must be much heavier than their ordinary relations, and so have not been seen. But the lightest super particles should be only around ten times heavier than the heaviest particles studied so far. Which requires machines for accelerate much higher than before.

Antimatter And The Six Quarks

Normal matter in the world around us is built from two types of quark, called “up” and “down”, which form neutrons and protons. It also requires two types of lepton: the electron and the electron-neutrino (which emerges for example in radioactive decays). This pattern repeats itself in two heavier “generations”, each with two quarks and two leptons.

Recent results from high the accelerator experiments and from astrophysics show that there can be no more generations of this type. We do not know why there are only three generations, or why the one that forms the world about us was not enough. However, this puzzle may be linked with one of the mysteries of the Universe: Where did the antimatter go? Experiments in particle physics show that matter and antimatter are always created in equal quantities, indicating that this should also have been so during the extremely energetic conditions of the early Universe. But if that were so, why did the antimatter not completely annihilate the matter, leaving only energy (photons) in the Universe? It seems instead that there was some small but significant asymmetry between matter and antimatter. The only clue we have to the origin of this asymmetry comes from a breakdown of the symmetry between particles and antiparticles known as CP-violation. Present understanding of this effect is inextricably tied up with the existence of three generations. So far it has been seen only in the neutral forms of particles called kaons, which contain “strange “quarks of the second-generation, and are currently made with protons beams. The new machines for accelerating particles like LHC at CERN’s is expected produce particles containing the heavier “bottom” quarks of the third generation. If the theory is right, particles containing bottom quarks should also reveal the symmetry breaking effect of CP violation.

But is this All?

The present description of matter – the Standard Model of particles and forces is being tested at high-energy experiments at different laboratories to great precision and proving remarkably successful. This is all the more surprising because the origin of one of the most fundamental properties of matter – mass – remains unknown. We do not know yet whether particles really do gain their different masses through the Higgs mechanism. In addition there are important questions that the Standard Model cannot answer. Can the electroweak and the strong forces be unified? Why are there six kinds of quark? Do neutrinos have mass? Such questions also relate to current mysteries about the Universe. Is there more to the Universe than meets the eye? Why does matter dominate antimatter? With all these questions in mind, Physicists are preparing for new machines, which will reach higher energies than ever before.

Mystery of matter


There are no limits to curiosity. We think about the evolution of life and our origins and even ask questions about the origin and ultimate end of the Universe. We seek answers to such questions in religion, philosophy and, most recently, in science. Today evidence suggests that the Universe originated in a Big Bang – an enormous expansion beginning some fifteen thousand million years ago, when the size of the whole Universe was less than the size of an atom. We have also found that all matter in the Universe is made up from a small number of basic building blocks, governed by a few fundamental forces. Particle physics is the study of these basic particles of matter and the forces that act upon them. It also looks at how matter evolved in the Universe, especially in the first seconds of the Big Bang, when many of the governing features of the Universe today were established. In this article we set out the ideas behind the scientific research at different high-energy research organizations.

Types Of Matter?

The world around us and the Universe beyond is built from a huge diversity of materials, and these forms of matter were common in the first instants of the early Universe. Surprisingly, however, this wide variety of matter is made from relatively few simple building blocks.

Ordinary Matter

All types of known matter in the Universe is built from nearly a hundred different type of atoms, each of which is made up of electrons having negative electric charge circulating around a positively charged nucleus. The nucleus further consists of nucleons-positive protons and neutral neutrons – each some 2000 times heavier than the electron. In this way the infinite variety of matter in the Universe is built from only three particles: the electron, the proton and the neutron. The electron seems to have no internal structure. However, the nucleons are composite particles, each containing three quarks. Like the electron, the quarks appear to have no internal structure. Only two types of quark, called “up” and “down”, are needed to build the proton and neutron. They have charges of +2/3 and -1/3 compared with the electron’s charge of -1. One more structure less particle must be added to complete the picture. This is a neutral and very light (possibly massless) particle called the electron neutrino, which behaves like an electron with no charge. It plays a vital role in reactions that convert neutrons to protons and vice versa. Such reactions allow matter to find its most stable form, in the processes of radioactivity, which lead to the elements we observe. They are also important in fuelling the Sun and other stars (where the lightest element, hydrogen, is converted first to helium, and then to successively heavier elements).

Cosmic Matter

Early in the 20th century, when Theodore Wulf took radiation detectors up the Eiffel Tower, he discovered that detectors registered more radiation at the top than on the ground (where he knew that radioactivity in the rocks gives a natural radiation). Studies of this “cosmic” radiation with detectors on the mountain-tops carried by balloons, showed that it is due to showers of particles created when high energy atomic nuclei (mainly protons) from outer space collide with atoms at the top of the earth’s atmosphere. This research has revealed that the particles created, known as cosmic rays, consist not only of the electrons, protons and neutrons of familiar matter, but also new kinds of particle. Near the ground, the cosmic rays include muons. These are just like the electron but 210 times heavier. But unlike electrons, muons are short lived. After an average lifetime of 2.2 microseconds, a muon will change into an electron and converting its extra mass into kinetic energy shared between the electron and two neutral particles. One is an electron neutrino, associated to the electron, while the other is a muon neutrino related to muon. The cosmic-ray muons emerge mainly from the decays of other short-lived particles. Some of these particles, like protons and neutrons, are made from up (denoted by u) and down (d) quarks. However, others contain a third type of quark, called the “strange” quark(s). So to understand the matter that exists as cosmic rays, we need more components than we need to make atoms. In addition to the electron, electron neutrino, up quark and down quark, we need the muon, the muon neutrino and the strange quark.

High Energy Matter

Cosmic rays provide an interesting natural high-energy laboratory, but it is difficult to work in this laboratory. The cosmic ray particles arrive unpredictably from all directions and with a whole range of energies. To study high energy particle collisions under more controlled conditions, particle physicists use laboratories such as CERN, DESY, FNAL etc, where high-energy particle colliders imitate the actions of cosmic rays in the atmosphere. Nowadays, these experiments reach energies that were common in the Universe only in the first instants of its existence.

Experiments at high energies have revealed new fundamental particles of matter that are too short-lived for easy identification in cosmic ray studies. One of the first to be found was a third charged particle like the electron, but far heavier than the electron or its other relative, the muon. This new particle, called the tau, is 3550 times heavier than the electron and lives for only one third of a millionth of a millionth of a second (0.3 x 10-12 s). The tau can change into the lighter electron or muon or even to the particles known as pions. Whichever way it decays, it always produces its neutral lightweight counterpart, the tau neutrino. Other heavy particles produced in high-energy collisions are composites, built from quarks, like the proton. However, these particles are much heavier because they include heavy quarks, which can be produced only at the higher energies. There are three heavier quarks called “charm”, “bottom” and “top”, which bring the total number of quarks to six. Unlike the lighter “up”, “down” and “strange” quarks, the three heavier quarks are even more massive than composite particles like the proton. The charm quark is one and a half times heavier than the proton, the bottom quark nearly five times heavier, while the top quarks weighs in with nearly 200 times the proton’s mass.


For each of the basic particles of matter, there also exists an antiparticle with properties such as electric charge are reversed. The common electron, for example, has negative charge, whilst its antiparticle, called the positron, has positive charge. Similarly the positively charged proton has a negatively charged antiparticle, the antiproton. Like the proton, the antiproton is a complex particle, but built from three antiquarks, with opposite charges to the quarks that form the proton. Antiparticles are made in energetic process together with particles – whenever a particle is created, an antiparticle must also be made. This means that there must be sufficient initial energy to make all the mass of the particle and antiparticle, according to the equation E=mc2. All kinds of particle-antiparticle pair can be made in this way provided there is enough energy. Particle-antiparticle pairs can be made when particles collide together, as in the energetic collisions of cosmic rays in the atmosphere. Positrons created in this way in cosmic ray interactions were the first antiparticles to be seen. Particle-antiparticle pairs can also materialize from the high-energy radiation known as gamma rays, provided the gamma ray has enough energy to make the necessary mass. When a particle and antiparticle of the same kind meet they soon disappear into a burst of pure energy, in a process called annihilation. The energy released is equal to the total energy of the annihilating pair, including the mass-energy, given by the equation E=mc2.

Dark Matter

Measurements in astronomy imply that up to 90% or more of the Universe is in the form of “dark matter”. This matter does not emit light or any other detectable radiation, so we cannot “see” it, but its presence is felt through its gravitational effects on the matter we can see. For example Stars in galaxies appear to be moving much faster than they would if only the visible matter in the galaxy influenced them. The gravitational lensing of a distant galaxy due to a foreground cluster of galaxies two billion light years away has allowed the reconstruction of the total mass of the foreground cluster and shows that the dark matter outweighs all the stars in the cluster’s galaxies by 250 times. The total mass is over 300 million million million times the mass of the Earth. Individual galaxies in the cluster appear as mass pinnacles. Some of the dark matter may be in the form of large planets or dead stars made from ordinary protons and neutrons. However cosmological theories imply that a large fraction of the dark matter must be of an entirely different form. Whatever its nature, it must be very weakly interacting, otherwise it would already have been detected. One possibility is that the weakly interacting particles called neutrinos could have a small mass, and make up dark matter, but the behaviour of neutrinos creates problem in theories of how galaxies formed in the Universe. Another possibility is that dark matter could be in the form of particles predicted by theories, but not yet seen. The idea of “super-symmetry” links matter particles with force-carrying particles, and implies the existence of heavy “super-particles”. The lightest of these super-particles could be stable; in which case large numbers of them created in the early Universe could now have clustered into structures of dark matter on the scale of galaxies.


Astrophysics Launches Technology

Astrophysicists strive to answer fundamental questions about the cosmos, from the origin of the universe in the big bang to the processes that form planets and lead to life on earth and possibly elsewhere. Technologies pioneered by astrophysicists to study the heavens have led to revolutionary advances in numerous fields including the $6 billion medical imaging industry, the $400 billion semiconductor industry, and the $1.5 trillion telecommunications industry

Semiconductor Industry
Astronomers developed X-ray and UV optics which help advance microchip lithography.
• Semiconductor manufacturers rely on quality control systems that include infrared detector arrays developed by astronomers.
• X-ray spectrometers that determine the chemical composition of cosmic plasmas are now checking for impurities in computer chip fabrication lines.

• The most common type of airport luggage scanners uses detectors first developed for x-ray astronomy.
• Technology from telescopes and observatories has been incorporated into satellites that monitor military activities around the globe.
• Astronomical image analysis techniques are now being used to sharpen photographs for police work.

Medical Imaging
• UV CCDs designed for Hubble Space Telescope are now incorporated into breast biopsy machines that reduce surgery and associated costs by as much 75%.
• Sensitive x-ray CCDs developed for astronomical imaging replace film in dental x-rays, minimizing exposure to radiation.
• Adaptive optics from advanced telescopes help map the eye retina and may lead to improved optical surgery and corrective lenses.

Computing Solutions
• The FORTH programming language, developed at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, has been used to develop applications for computers carried by Federal Express agents, auto engine analyzers, and Kodak’s film manufacturing process.

Portable xxx -ray
•The portable Low Intensity X-ray Imaging Scope (Lixiscope) is now NASA’s second largest source of royalties, and is increasingly common in emergency rooms, sports health facilities, and other areas where rapid, low level x-ray images are vital.

High Performance Graphics
• The popular IDL graphical package originated from imaging software written for the Mariner Mars probes

Archeology & Artifacts
• Astrophysicists used infrared imaging technology to document the status of the Star Spangled Banner and to monitor its future degradation.
• Earth imaging satellites are guiding archeologists to prehistoric cities buried beneath desert sands.